Skip to main content

Peter McRae, CEO of Aussie-based customs broker Platinum Freight Management, believes Australia should take lessons from New Zealand on how to keep its borders safe from biosecurity risks.

Australia faces a biosecurity risk due to an inadequate risk assessment of wood materials found in packaging materials, says McRae (pictured), whose company operates on both sides of the Tasman. 

“Our neighbours across the Tasman have a risk assessment process which Australia’s Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (DAWR) could learn from and which, I would argue, would be a huge improvement to our current process.
“In a nutshell, Australia doesn’t check containers, meaning wooden packaging that has not been fumigated is slipping across our borders undeclared and unchecked,” says McRae. 
He is referring in particular to the processing of Less Than Container Load (LCL) shipments. 
In the Australian context, LCLs require a one-page packing declaration that identifies and ‘risk-assesses’ any wood used as packaging and further, whether any wood has been treated to Australian biosecurity standards. If wood is contained and has not been treated, it needs to be inspected, treated or disposed. 
There are a few issues with this process, says McRae:
1.    The person filling out the packing declaration is either the supplier or the packer; both commercially connected to the importer and therefore with a potential conflict of interest. 
2.    DAWR doesn’t physically check LCL cargo to ensure that forms have been accurately completed
3.    The template is only supplied in English regardless of the language of the person completing the document, usually an international supplier. “I have often wondered how many of the people filling out the form even understand the language on the form.”
4.    The form has been changed three times in the past two years.
“There is no surprise then, to learn that the forms are frequently incorrect and as a customs broker, I commonly need to ask the supplier to prepare another declaration to bring it to the new standard, or to ask if the answers are accurate. 
“But not all LCL shipments are assessed by a customs broker, self-assessed clearances under the tax-free threshold can be completed by anyone.”
If Australia is to keep its borders safe from biosecurity risks, McRae says it needs to be sure that the risks are not slipping under its nose. “And for that we can look to New Zealand’s process.” 
“New Zealand, generally regarded to be more responsible for its pristine environment, doesn’t require packaging declarations for LCL cargo. Instead, all LCL cargo is inspected at the unpack depot before the cargo is released,” explains McRae. “A system of thorough checks like this is positive because, from the get-go, suppliers and importers know that cargo will be checked, which means that they will self-regulate to meet quarantine requirements in order to avoid storage and or further fees.” 
McRae believes the process is effective.
“In the past 12 months, DAWR has changed its one-page packing declaration three times in order to improve its accuracy. But it is still only in English. It is still only filled out by the importer’s people and it is still not checked against the cargo. 
“I would argue therefore, that it still holds little value. Changing the document doesn’t solve the problem, physically checking the containers would.”  

Glenn Baker

Glenn is a professional writer/editor with 50-plus years’ experience across radio, television and magazine publishing.


Dishing up export possibilities

Exporter Today Editorial TeamExporter Today Editorial TeamApril 16, 2012

What’s mine is not yours

Exporter Today Editorial TeamExporter Today Editorial TeamApril 16, 2012

25 countries… and counting

Exporter Today Editorial TeamExporter Today Editorial TeamApril 16, 2012